Debate #2: Technology a Force for Equity

Yesterday’s topic on the Great EdTech Debate was Technology is a force for equity in society. Nataly and Kalyn on the agree side, and Victoria and Jasmine on the disagree side.  Coming into the debate I voted in favour of the topic, however, I was unsure how I would feel by the end of this debate.  I was truly on the fence on this one.

Nataly and Kalyn highlighted three main reasons why technology is a force for equity in society.

  1. Greater access to information
  2. Personalized learning
  3. Helps people with disabilities

Victoria and Jasmine took on the opposing side, also made many excellent points on the other side. Their main arguments focus on

  1. The Digital Divide
  2. Techno-Colonialism
  3. The Non-Neutrality of Technology
The Main Take-Aways:

Being on the fence before the debate, after watching the debate left me even more stuck in the middle.  Both duos provided excellent points that highlighted the pros and cons of the topic.

Open Educational Resources (OERs)

Kalyn and Nataly discussed OERs.  OERs are a way to provide high-quality educational resources will no cost.  This would be invaluable to students and educators.  According to RMIT University, OERs provide opportunities for self-learning, and also include literacy skills such as searching, reusing, dissemination, branding, and networking.  All important skills we would want society to have.

Furthermore, in our group discussion we brought up the website Coursera, Coursera is a platform that offers many different university courses for free.  This on the surface appears to be a great equitable idea and service.  However, our discussion pointed out that it was often the most privileged in society that would use these courses.  My thought is that many of the courses still use academic language, and require skills that many people have not had the opportunities to acquire.

Assistive Technology

Kalyn and Nataly also brought up the excellent point of assistive technology.   Assistive Technology provides many for our students to learn.  Tools such as Google Read and Write, and Microsoft’s Immersive Reader provide opportunities to try to “Level the playing field” for students.

In the discussion, we discussed the importance of Universal Design for Learning.  I believe for technology to be truly equitable within Assistive Technology we need to approach if from a UDL perspective.  This means teaching the whole class how to use a program such as Microsoft’s Immersive Reader.  This is because many students would benefit from the tool regardless of ability.  This also allows students to not feel singled out.  Students pieces that they need to be successful.

The Digital Divide

We need to acknowledge the digital divide.

Affordability, the fact is that many cannot afford the technology needed to be successful. However, I do believe that this is becoming more and more realistic in the future as technology costs continue to be driven down.

Accessibility, as Victoria and Jasmine note, many rural areas do not have access to technology.  In our discussion in class we discussed that although we classify high-speed internet at 5mbps, the reality is that we often need a lot more than 5mbps for us to be effective online.  The reality is that often those with the least amount of accessibility are the people who are considered the most vulnerable. This includes northern Saskatchewan and many reserves.

Varying ability,  many people do not have the technical skills required to be efficient users of technology.  This could be due to previous issues with affordability, or accessibility of technology, or could be due to not having the skills taught. Jennifer Casa-Todd explains that there is an intergenerational divide, parents are not fully understanding the tools that their kids are using.

Last semester I also look into the digital divide, another form of inequity is the idea of empowerment divide.  According to the Nielsen Norman Group, when people participate online 90% of people do not contribute, 9% contribute sporadically, and 1% of users contribute often.

In Conclusion,

Overall, I swayed a bit to the disagree side.  I think that often that I become blinded by the fact that I am privileged enough to not recognize the impacts of the digital divide because I have never had to worry about not having access to technology.  I believe for us to truly become equitable these issues need to be addressed.  In the Hechinger Report Should Schools Teach Anyone Who Can Get Online of No One At All that Jasmine and Victoria highlight, “We should be thinking about internet connectivity as a utility right now,” he said. “We  would be horrified if 30 percent of our families didn’t have electricity or water in their homes.”  We need to ensure that our students have internet access outside of school.  Kalyn and Nataly shared an article called How Access to Technology Can Create Equity in Schools, it compares having access to physical technology and having no internet to having a car with no road.  The car is still useful, but it is a lot easier if a road is built.  In the end, I believe that technology can provide equity in many situations, but as a society, we are not there yet.

5 thoughts on “Debate #2: Technology a Force for Equity

  1. Curtis, I really enjoyed reading your conclusion! You had a lot of powerful statements in there, many of which made me stop and think about my own privilege with technology. I completely agree that always having technology can make us a little less aware of the divide it can create. Working in the school I do, I have become more aware of this divide, which perhaps makes me more critical of this topic. Also, I love your closing argument: technology CAN be equitable in some situations, but, as a society, we have a long way to go to achieve equity.

  2. Curtis, I loved reading your blog post! You provided such a nice overview of the two presentations. I very much feel like you. I love the many benefits that technology provides but at the same time we need to realize that due to the affordability and accessibility of technology and broadband, our vulnerable population is suffering even more.

  3. It is important to use a Universal Design for Learning approach to maximise the use of technology in the classroom, so it benefits everyone and not just students with disabilities. I’ve had a student completely refuse the use of a computer because she didn’t want to stand out in the classroom. It broke my heart that she felt like she couldn’t embrace her differences, but I totally understood where she stood so I did my best to prepare activities that would encourage everyone to use a computer. Sometimes this is hard to do because they are not available at all times. We have 30 laptops available in our school and 100 students to serve. Some are unavailable because they need repair or aren’t working anymore so we have to remember to reserve them in the library when we do want to use them (which is, a lot of the time). Thanks for the great post Curtis.

  4. Great blog post. I really appreciate the insight you gave about the percentage of people who actively participate in online learning. I was very surprised to read that wen learning online 90% of people do not contribute. However, now that I have had the opportunity of teaching fully online, this number seems to be rather accurate now that I come to think of it.

  5. Hey Curtis, I completely agree with what you stated in your conclusion paragraph. I also agree that we need to value internet connectivity, especially in today’s society. Connection and communication is completely different than what it was like pre-internet. There is a growing demand on staying connected, which is difficult to do if you were unable to afford internet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s